Idylls of the King by Gustave Doré
Precis: Barack Obama's inauguration engenders hope in many hearts, but is hardly the triumph it might seem at first glance. Beyond the earnest wishes and projected aspirations of his starry-eyed supporters, Obama remains an abiding mystery, an ambitious enigma who has carefully crafted a public persona of All Things to All People.
The Chief Executive must be made of sterner stuff and I am filled with foreboding. The last two presidents have proven unequal to the greatness of the tasks, yet both were elected to two terms. I have some confidence in Obama, far less in those who surround him and none whatsoever in the Congress or the Supreme Court. Hard times are ahead: the bets are on the table and we will either succeed greatly or fail greatly.
The text of today's sermon is taken from Tennyson's Idyll's of the King
So, when their feet were planted on the plain
That broadened toward the base of Camelot,
Far off they saw the silver-misty morn
Rolling her smoke about the Royal mount,
That rose between the forest and the field.
At times the summit of the high city flashed;
At times the spires and turrets half-way down
Pricked through the mist; at times the great gate shone
Only, that opened on the field below:
Anon, the whole fair city had disappeared.
Then those who went with Gareth were amazed,
One crying, 'Let us go no further, lord.
Here is a city of Enchanters, built
By fairy Kings.' The second echoed him,
'Lord, we have heard from our wise man at home
To Northward, that this King is not the King,
But only changeling out of Fairyland,
Who drave the heathen hence by sorcery
And Merlin's glamour.' Then the first again,
'Lord, there is no such city anywhere,
But all a vision.'
Part the First: The Royal Mount
The festivities of the moment are upon us. Our government has passed peacefully from one regime to another, all done with seeming comity and good order. The outgoing president has behaved himself with a measure of grace, and if he's recently indulged in a bit self-excusing, I'll forgive him that little. The country convulses with paroxysms of delight and hope. But delight is a child on Christmas morning before the toy breaks, and hope's what people have when nothing's happened yet.
Yet how should we react to the election of our new President, how should he be seen?
Every child in Civics class is taught of the tripartite divisions of power in our government. Over time, Congress has ceded many of its powers to an ever-more-powerful Executive. The courts are left to puzzle through the morass: the Fourth Amendment is as dead as the tyrannosaurs, and where Congress might have stood up to the Executive over warrantless wiretapping and the connivance of the telephone companies, now Congress abjectly capitulates to passing legislation absolving one and all. Pardon via ex-post-facto legislation is the order of the day, meaningless subpoenas issued to paper over the violations of our rights.
For all his good intentions, President Obama must pole his johnboat through the swamps at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. It is no accident Obama has befriended so many ardent Conservatives: he will need their maps and tide tables to navigate those shallow waters, divining the falsity and treachery within his own party. Nor is the choice of Joe Biden as Vice President an idle concession to vote-getting: from his perch atop the dais of the Senate, Biden will cast his jaundiced eye upon the doings of those self-important rascals and report it all to his novice commander. For this reason the Congressional Democrats have promised to push Biden away from their caucuses, they know what's up, none better. The last two years of Democratic majorities have produced no substantive reforms or investigations and I expect none in future. The Republican minority may prove Obama's secret weapon: the shillelagh with which he shall beat the do-nothing Democrats into line.
Washington, indeed the whole world is convulsed by the spectacle of a Black Man elected to the Presidency of the United States. The TV burbles in the corner, Larry King solicits the opinions of the scions and also-rans of the Black Civil Rights movement. My own heritage includes many unsung heroes of the Black Civil Rights era, and the blazing crosses of the Klan illuminated my @!$%#-lovin' grandfather's home. Lynching was a common enough thing in the shantytown just down East Cleveland Avenue in East Point Georgia. While the multitudes gather on the Mall, the grim realities of Washington D.C.'s less-fortunate permanent residents remain a lasting disgrace to our nation.
l am therefore horrified to see fawning encomiums heaped upon any man judged on the color of his skin. I am disgusted to hear the phrase Post-Racial bandied about, vaguely nauseated by the saccharine enthusiasms of persons of color who look upon Obama as their personal savior. Ecce Homo, Obama is only a man. A good man, certainly, but he is no more than a man.
Barack Obama sat in a church pew, soaking up the intemperate and racially-divisive works of Rev. Jeremiah Wright whose church unabashedly preaches a black separatist vision of Jesus Christ despite our Lord's explicit words to the contrary. We are the product of all who shaped us, and if the portly, goateed, allegedly homophobic Pastor Rick Warren gives the opening invocation of the Almighty at the end of this race, let no man forget it was Rev. Jeremiah Wright who gave the invocation on the steps of the old Illinois State Capital when Obama stepped up to the starting line of this race. I know enough of the American Black theologians to know they, too, have no more tolerance for homosexual persons than the genial Reverend Warren.
My own faith has changed over time: increasingly I find myself at odds with what passes for both organized religion and organized politics. It all seems a sham, a framework for the indulgence of comfortable and patently dangerous nonsense. Politicians cuddle up to religion with obscene frottage, making profane and false obeisance to the sacred abstractions. The political parties swear false oaths to the causes of justice, true faith and allegiance only to themselves and their causes. Watch and see, there will be no accounting for the evils done in our name over the past decades. There will instead be a massive glossing-over, a titanic national delusion, a gargantuan avoidance mechanism shall be erected where today stand the banners of battle and the trophies of victory.
Yes We Might.
Yes we can. We might. But we probably won't. That we ought to change will never again be given voice: the leathery prophets in the wilderness who preached of wickedness in high places and the coming of change shall be politely ignored.
Obama's cabinet is richly populated with the hacks of yore, chiefly of Clinton vintage. If in February of 2001, a Martian read the resumes of Bush the Dumber's Cabinet choices, he might also be convinced the nation was well-led by seasoned veterans if the Chief Executive was no such thing. Bush was led about by the nose, a man out of his league. Given the Abgrund between resumes and results, why should I believe Obama's well-seasoned hacks will serve his cause any better than Bush's hacks served his?
I reserve judgment on Barack Obama's chances against the fecklessness of Congress, especially against the wiles of that shameless, skeevy varlet Harry Reid and the equally execrable Nancy Pelosi. Already we have seen this pair of villains dole out our money, more precisely our children's money, into the rat holes of the still-unregulated financial system without even the fig leaf of accountability. All talk of the no-bid contracts in Iraq must now be put in abeyance: at least those contracts were on the record. The utter shamelessness of the whole wretched TARP mechanism shows Congress has placed itself as far beyond the reach of accountability as ever did the Executive over the last two terms.
Already we see the hushing up of the Progressives, the political dog returns to his vomit as the fool does to his folly. We will not be given substantive change if the Congress and the courtiers have anything to say about it. These skulking eunuchs may reduce Obama to Clinton the Second, that weathervane of gormlessness and doubletalk. Already we see a Clinton as Secretary of State and that woman is no Progressive politician. I remember how the Daily Kossacks drave the heathen Hillarites from thence by sorcery from their orange Elysium. But the marriage counselors and psychologists of the Democratic Party saw fit to welcome them back. It is with deepest contempt I must tell you all as I told them then it was the Kossacks who were fooled: Hillary's political judo trumped all their prattle and trumps it still. Eighteen million votes is a whole lotta ass meat. Hillary Clinton proved the master of the hane goshi throw and the Progressives were thrown in the air, landing in disarray on the political mat. Now the Progressives promise to hold Obama's feet to the fire, but he has no further use for their wise man at home to Northward. This King is not their King and his vision is not their vision. Ever is the vision of the politician that of power and power is votes, the only poll that ever mattered.
Lord, there is no such city anywhere, but all is a vision. America's spires and turrets are built on mountains of debt and a fairyland of trust in the faithless apostles of the unregulated Free Market. We have indulged ourselves in fantasies of national superiority and continue to do so, all the while condemning the Islamists who make no bones of their urge to subdue the world to their own vision of harsh justice and superiority. Think Obama won't perpetuate these fantasies? He's going to send even more troops into Afghanistan, recapitulating the failures of Bush in Iraq, in the one place in the world where every textbook of military history tells us empires go to die. Less Lincoln and more Plutarch for President Obama: let our Fearless Leader see how Alexander fared east of Persia, both in the nature of Alexander's successes and failures.
Anon, the whole fair city had disappeared, the reckoning has come due. Yet the illusion has not been dispelled.
Obama is a fine man, as good a man as the times have produced and the country is well-pleased with him, both Republicans and Democrats alike are charmed by his glamour. But of old, the word Glamour meant a spell of illusion,
For there is nothing in it as it seems
Saving the King; though some there be that hold
The King a shadow, and the city real:
Yet take thou heed of him, for, so thou pass
Beneath this archway, then wilt thou become
A thrall to his enchantments, for the King
Will bind thee by such vows, as is a shame
A man should not be bound by, yet the which
No man can keep; but, so thou dread to swear,
Pass not beneath this gateway, but abide
Without, among the cattle of the field.
For an ye heard a music, like enow
They are building still, seeing the city is built
To music, therefore never built at all,
And therefore built for ever.
The USA is a republic: we grant mandate to our leaders for a set period of time, but once granted, nothing short of impeachment or death can drive them out until the next election. We lack a No Confidence vote as does a parliamentary system. We're stuck with this guy, for better or worse, let us hope for better. He will be better, but of this we have no guarantee at all, despite his vastly enlarged powers, granted to him by Congress. Obama may replace a few Supreme Court justices, but even those appointments will only shore up the aging Liberal cause: unless a large meteorite strike kills them all en banc, Bush's true legacy is will be his SCOTUS appointments. Scalia and his Stepin Fetchit butler Clarence Thomas remain spry and healthy, perfectly capable of doing great damage to what remains of the Constitution. Do not look to the hidebound mummies of Strict Construction in this Supreme Court for any vindication or return of our rights in law, especially not from Chief Justice Roberts, who has shown his true colors of late. And I had such hopes for him.
Conclusion:
While the adoring eyes of the world turn to the young man behind the podium, my own eyes are turned to the horizon. The world will soon tire of its infatuation with our handsome and charismatic president, as they tired of John F. Kennedy, another handsome man whose shallow eloquence led us closer to the nuclear abyss than at any time in history. And it was Kennedy who played with fire in Vietnam, played fast and loose with the facts, whose idealism was ill-served by the Best and Brightest who surrounded him. Have a caution in this moment of national pride that your love is not misplaced, that you do not become a thrall to enchantments, for we are already bound to vows we cannot keep. That city is built to music, therefore never built at all and therefore built forever.
Quite a jeremiad and pretty close to right although you overstate the thirst for so-called "Progressivism". My own sense is that Obama, playing to his general inclination as has been shown over the length of his political career, will say hey diddle, diddle, diddle, let's go up the middle on everything save for his judicial appointees where he will throw the left the bones they howl for. And I also believe you correct in implying that his first test will come in beating back the tiredest of the tired left in his own party who will seek to turn this "stimulus" bill into a hoary retread of government-expanding, economically marginal, New Dealism. And somewhere, perhaps now unseen, an event across the waves shall come forth to put the best laid plans of technocrats and "good" government types and this new president to a test they might not have seen coming.
DW, the Irish ain't Arabs. Good lord. I see few, if any, parallels to the situation in Israel. I mean what is the approximation of Gaza in Ulster? And whatever the merits of the arguments between the Orangemen and Sinn Fein, I don't recall one calling for the eradication of the other and its people. This spectacle, observed up close, of the Obama investiture and the rapture of some of the faithful is quite frankly embarrassing and I'm well-disposed to the guy. I was in the company of a 22 year old female Hill wanna-be tonight and while charming physically I could only shudder at the ignorance pouring forth between those ruby lips.
I'm sorry but I just don't see the type of similarities both culturally and from a religious standpoint that would make this work for the Israeli-Palestinian question. My own view is that both Clinton and Bush rushed things along precipitously and after Oslo the best thing that could have happened in the region is the type of UN trusteeship for a Palestinian entity suggested by Marty Indyk. I still think the idea has merit although it's probably too late now.
You and your readers do realise that the King William (the Third, Prince of Orange presumably) you talk about did not bring Protestants to Ireland (i'm guessing your talking about the Plantation of Scottish and English settlers into the North East of Ulster which happened about 200 years prior to King William landing in Ireland) and i'm sorry to have to say this but you don't seem to have any sense of Belfast's Geography there are not really any small Roman Catholic enclaves surrounded by Protestant areas in fact it would be the other way round with many Protestants being forced from their homes and being murdered by TERRORISTS and so leaving only a small number of protestants prepared to live under siege as it were from republicans. Just look up information about Cluan Place for example to see what is really happening in this country and please stop believing the rubbish sinnfein/IRA tell you. The Protestant people of Ulster just want to live in peace.
look up info on the "families acting for innocent relatives"
So if we strip back your flowery and verbose article to its central argument: You don't like Obama because he has appointed a good number of Clinton's former staff members. I can't say that I noticed a single cogent argument supporting your premise of Obama as king, however.
I can't say that I noticed a single cogent argument supporting your premise of Obama as king, however.
He didn't say Obama was a king. He said we run the risk of seeing things that aren't there, of falling prey to illusions and will'o'the'wisps...
I must have lost his meaning somewhere along the way, then. Judging by the lack of responses to the article, I doubt that I'm the only one.
9/10ths of the largely illiterate (in the larger sense) readership of Newsvine wouldn't know the Idylls of the King from American Idol.
And of the remaining 10%, most don't appear to be remotely interested when Tennyson's poem is tangentially linked to Obama in an article that makes Tolkien appear succinct by comparison.
RNoel--
And your point being?
Good lord, Blaise. That was eloquent cynicism at its finest. Requires a second reading to be sure...
I enjoy your style of writing a great deal.
Although I'm happy I voted for him, all the ceremony and optimism about Obama worries me a bit. I put it partly to the fact that I am a cynic at heart.
The truth is though, that elections in America are not about locating some perfect candidate and electing him, that simply isn't what we do. What happens is two huge masses of people select a candidate, and then we vote between the two of them. Whatever may happen, there is no way that anybody will be able to convince me that McCain and (shudder) Palin were a wise choice. I think another reason that Obama is riding high now is because McCain so debased himself during the campaign that he continues to look good by comparison.
I wish him the best, and I hope that he succeeds because he needs to lead us out of the terrible place we are in. I think he will benefit from the awesome ineptitude of his predecessor. The man was such a fool, it will help him to look brilliant by comparison. The fact that he seems genuinely intelligent on his own merits will help, but there is no way of knowing what the next four years will bring.
For a self-proclaimed cynic (most cynics are intelligent) there's a lot of asshatted stupidity in that post. Had McCain done what many of his advisers urged him to do and pointedly and repeatedly made Obama's associations with a lot of very unsavory characters like Jeremiah Wright front and center of his advertising campaign the results might have been quite different and almost certainly would have been without a remarkable string of political luck for Obama beginning with the meltdown in the financial markets in mid-August. The fact that McCain didn't play this card that was there for the playing speaks volumes about his character and volumes about those who would question it. To the extent that Obama stands up to the leftwing of the Democratic Party on fiscal policy and hews to 90% of the Bush foreign policy (which he shows signs of doing) he has a chance to be a successful president. If he does not, he's likely a one-term wonder and most assuredly will be if the economy is not into a strong recovery by 2012 (a future event by no means certain).
Ok... I suppose this is a waste of time, but just for the hell of it I'll respond.
Palin was certainly happy to bring up Ayers repeatedly, and it didn't appear to help. In fact, an objective view of it is that a lot of this crap hurt. The thing about the Wright issue is that everyone, and I do mean everyone, knew about it. All they do was sit there and repeat what everyone knew. If they'd tried to make an issue of it, they would have simply looked even more offensive then they already did. The matter was fully explored for months and months. And guess what, nobody cared. You know why they didn't care?
Because it only mattered to you if you had already made up your mind to hate Obama. Yes, his reverend was a loon. I had a preacher was was a loon, he stood up in my church and talked about hispanics being at war with white people. He was also a pretty good guy who raised a lot of money for the church, and did a lot of good things around the community. I didn't agree with him, and eventually he had to go, that's life. Do I feel guilty because I didn't demand his head when he occasionally said something stupid? No, not really. I'm aware of Obama's so called shady connections, and it's bull@!$%#. Republicans have become the masters of guilt by association, because the party is generally so lacking in substance.
McCain's campaign was pathetic. He engaged in one stupid after another, and engaging in even more personal attacks then he did engage in didn't help. His number one sin, was picking Palin. And that was something to truly be ashamed of. He tried to put an idiot a heartbeat away from the presidency, and that is just unforgivable.
His absurd spectacle of halting his campaign didn't help him. He obviously wasn't trying to help, he was just pulling a stunt, and assuming the voters were stupid enough to take him seriously. He didn't help the situation, he probably made it worse.
Now is there any point in saying this? No, not really. Your an intelligent guy, but you use your intelligence in the same way a drunk uses a lamp post on the street; you lean on it for support, rather then using it for illumination.
And so you come on here and skirt the edges of the COH whenever you can, insulting people to satiate your rage. Should I feel sorry for you, or should I feel happy for you, because you'll have so many reasons to be angry for the next four years?
I have a better idea... I think I'll just ignore you, and not give you any more thought. I'm sure there are many more people to insult on newsvine, who will continue to read your obnoxious posts.
By the way Bill, it's guys like you who've helped mobilize the left to be angrier and more organized then ever before. Good or bad for you? I'm just not sure.
By the way Bill, it's guys like you who've helped mobilize the left to be angrier and more organized then ever before.
Go sell that at 1600 Penn. and see what it gets you. The rest of your post is just surpassingly dumb. The Wright contretemps was a brief affair ending before anyone else in the country beside the small slice that actually pays attention to such things early in a campaign had even noticed much. I mean the issue of the general MSM's lack of interest in Obama's Chicago political dealings isn't even disputed by anyone anymore as could be gleaned by a quick perusal of the many mea culpa that littered the ombudsman's columns of any number of media organizations after the election. I'm well disposed to Obama myself as anyone familiar with my columns since August would know so don't come around here and start making reference to anyone "hating" anyone. Got it? Jack?
A un jor d'une Acenssion Fu venuz de vers Carlion Li rois Artus et tenu ot Cort molt riche a Camaalot Si riche com au jor estut.
(Upon a certain Ascension Day King Arthur had come from Caerleon, and had held a very magnificent court at Camelot as was fitting on such a day.)
I can no longer see us revisiting Camelot, that kingdom is now retired and is of another place and time.
Perhaps the rightful place for this specific place and time is Oz and the Emerald City, with Merlin replaced by the wizard; for there is no longer a Lady of the Lake, there is no incubus, and Excalibur is once more embedded in the stone.
And when will be the time when we hear, "The next time I go looking for my heart's desire, I won't look any further than my own backyard; if it's not there, then I never really lost it to begin with."
Excellent points; I so have to agree with all aspects of your assessment, especially the one raised about the speech being written for the world. Interestingly, this premise by the way could transform it into one for the ages.
Fantastic work Blaise.
The employment of the older meaning of glamour I found struck me deepest. As most of the nation applauds Obama and the call for recovery begins to filter in from economist across the spectrum, I can't help but to point to the many other players still in massive distress (Britian, China, Russia, to name a few). If any of these sizable anchors in the global economy fall down, there will be very little our newly elected president can do to stop what will follow.
We are beset on all sides by countless problems. You rightly pointed out that this is not a task that one man (or even possibly a nation) can handle.
I wonder if McCain is silently grateful he didn't get elected...
Always intriguing and riveting works, yours are, BlaiseP! An amazing mind and panoramic vision you possess! You not only ask us to put this grand event and moment in our nation's history into an epic perspective, but you also expose us to ourselves! We are this nation. We are a moment in time, emerging as we have in almost mythic fashions, and so eager to believe we are more than what we really are!
I love your works! I myself am a sort of knight in some fashion of spirit, and subconsciously bear fealty to the hope and promise of a near-universal myth! What call to arms, what oath to honor and duty, what urgency do you feel needs be voiced?
BlaiseP,
Positively ecclesiastical -- all is vanity! I share your affliction: advancing age complicated by abating confidence in our institutions.
President Obama's biggest challenge certainly lies within his own party. Astute observation regarding the selection of Biden.
I have recently become enamored of the notion of term limits for some of the very reasons you present. Our republic is barely representative nowadays.
Thank you for your contribution to my day. I always smile to see a BlaiseP article in my conversation tracker. It may not be good news, but it is always enjoyably readable.
Thank you for your contribution to my day. I always smile to see a BlaiseP article in my conversation tracker. It may not be good news, but it is always enjoyably readable.
That's for damn sure, Ellie. I echo the entirety of your post...
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |